Klub podany w głosowaniu imiennym tego posła w tym samym dniu i posiedzeniu: KO · dowód głosu. Nie jest to pełna historia członkostwa.
Pełna wypowiedź
10. kadencja, 37. posiedzenie, 2. dzień (25-06-2025) 22. punkt porządku dziennego: Sprawozdanie Komisji Cyfryzacji, Innowacyjności i Nowoczesnych Technologii o rządowym projekcie ustawy o krajowym systemie certyfikacji cyberbezpieczeństwa (druki nr 1238 i 1249). Poseł Małgorzata Pępek: Mówimy o ustawie, która może naprawdę pomóc polskim firmom z branży internetowej, technologicznej i cyfrowej. To jest projekt, który wprowadza jasne zasady certyfikacji cyberbezpieczeństwa, coś, co dziś staje się równie ważne jak znak jakości. Firmy, które uzyskają taki certyfikat będą mogły łatwiej zdobywać zaufanie klientów, wchodzić na nowe rynki i zawierać kontrakty, także zagraniczne. Jeśli ktoś będzie wiedział, że dana usługa albo produkt cyfrowy spełnia określone standardy bezpieczeństwa, to po prostu chętniej z niej skorzysta. To ogromna szansa dla firm działających w Polsce, szczególnie tych, które oferują oprogramowanie, usługi online, urządzenia cyfrowe, systemy IT czy aplikacje. Co ważne, nikt nikogo nie zmusza do certyfikacji, ale ci (Dzwonek), którzy się zdecydują, naprawdę mogą na tym zyskać. Chciałabym zapytać: Czy w ustawie przewidziano zasady kontroli już przyznanych certyfikatów? Kto będzie mógł je weryfikować? Co w przypadku wykrycia nieprawidłowości? Dziękuję. Przebieg posiedzenia
1. (4.66ms; exec 4.58 + fetch 0.08; rows 1) SELECT s.object_id AS statement_id, s.statement_number, s.speaker_name, s.source_member_id, mp.object_id AS member_id, day.object_id AS day_id, day.term, day.proceeding_number, day.source_date, day.current_revision_id AS day_revision_id, dayStatement.ordinal, dayEvidence.id AS list_evidence_id, dayEvidence.selector_type AS list_selector_type, dayEvidence.selector AS list_selector, dayFetch.id AS list_fetch_id, dayFetch.requested_url AS list_source_url, dayArtifact.sha256 AS list_sha256, binding.artifact_id, binding.evidence_id AS transcript_evidence_id, transcriptEvidence.selector_type AS transcript_selector_type, transcriptEvidence.selector AS transcript_selector, transcriptFetch.id AS transcript_fetch_id, transcriptFetch.requested_url AS transcript_source_url, artifact.sha256 AS transcript_sha256, artifact.detected_mime, artifact.byte_size FROM sejm_statements s JOIN sejm_transcript_days day ON day.object_id = s.transcript_day_id LEFT JOIN sejm_mp_identities mp ON mp.term = day.term AND mp.mp_number = s.source_member_id LEFT JOIN sejm_transcript_day_statements dayStatement ON dayStatement.day_id = day.object_id AND dayStatement.day_revision_id = day.current_revision_id AND dayStatement.statement_id = s.object_id LEFT JOIN evidence dayEvidence ON dayEvidence.id = dayStatement.evidence_id LEFT JOIN fetches dayFetch ON dayFetch.id = dayEvidence.fetch_id LEFT JOIN artifacts dayArtifact ON dayArtifact.id = dayEvidence.artifact_id LEFT JOIN documents document ON document.owner_object_id = day.object_id AND document.document_kind = 'statement_transcript' AND document.source_document_key = CONCAT('sejm:statement:', s.statement_number) LEFT JOIN document_versions version ON version.document_id = document.object_id AND version.sequence_no = (SELECT MAX(latest.sequence_no) FROM document_versions latest WHERE latest.document_id = document.object_id) LEFT JOIN document_version_artifacts binding ON binding.version_id = version.object_id AND binding.role = 'html' AND binding.current_selector_sha IS NOT NULL LEFT JOIN evidence transcriptEvidence ON transcriptEvidence.id = binding.evidence_id LEFT JOIN fetches transcriptFetch ON transcriptFetch.id = transcriptEvidence.fetch_id LEFT JOIN artifacts artifact ON artifact.id = binding.artifact_id WHERE s.object_id = 104981 LIMIT 1
2. (3.6ms; exec 3.57 + fetch 0.03; rows 1) WITH ranked AS ( SELECT extraction.id, extraction.source_artifact_id, extraction.quality_state, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY extraction.source_artifact_id ORDER BY CASE extraction.quality_state WHEN 'success' THEN 0 WHEN 'unreadable' THEN 1 ELSE 2 END, run.finished_at DESC, extraction.id DESC) AS preference FROM extractions extraction JOIN processing_runs run ON run.id = extraction.run_id WHERE extraction.source_artifact_id IN (95145) AND run.state = 'completed' ) SELECT ranked.source_artifact_id, ranked.id, ranked.quality_state, segment.source_text AS source_text FROM ranked LEFT JOIN text_segments segment ON segment.extraction_id = ranked.id WHERE ranked.preference = 1 ORDER BY ranked.source_artifact_id, segment.ordinal
3. (3.07ms; exec 3.02 + fetch 0.05; rows 4) SELECT statement.object_id, statement.statement_number, statement.speaker_name, dayStatement.ordinal, binding.artifact_id FROM sejm_transcript_day_statements dayStatement JOIN sejm_statements statement ON statement.object_id = dayStatement.statement_id LEFT JOIN documents document ON document.owner_object_id = dayStatement.day_id AND document.document_kind = 'statement_transcript' AND document.source_document_key = CONCAT('sejm:statement:', statement.statement_number) LEFT JOIN document_versions version ON version.document_id = document.object_id AND version.sequence_no = (SELECT MAX(latest.sequence_no) FROM document_versions latest WHERE latest.document_id = document.object_id) LEFT JOIN document_version_artifacts binding ON binding.version_id = version.object_id AND binding.role = 'html' AND binding.language = 'und' AND binding.current_selector_sha IS NOT NULL WHERE dayStatement.day_id = 104850 AND dayStatement.day_revision_id = 107472 AND dayStatement.ordinal BETWEEN 128 AND 132 AND statement.object_id <> 104981 ORDER BY dayStatement.ordinal
4. (2.41ms; exec 2.35 + fetch 0.06; rows 4) WITH ranked AS ( SELECT extraction.id, extraction.source_artifact_id, extraction.quality_state, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY extraction.source_artifact_id ORDER BY CASE extraction.quality_state WHEN 'success' THEN 0 WHEN 'unreadable' THEN 1 ELSE 2 END, run.finished_at DESC, extraction.id DESC) AS preference FROM extractions extraction JOIN processing_runs run ON run.id = extraction.run_id WHERE extraction.source_artifact_id IN (95143, 95144, 95146, 95147) AND run.state = 'completed' ) SELECT ranked.source_artifact_id, ranked.id, ranked.quality_state, LEFT(segment.source_text, 240) AS source_text FROM ranked LEFT JOIN text_segments segment ON segment.extraction_id = ranked.id WHERE ranked.preference = 1 ORDER BY ranked.source_artifact_id, segment.ordinal
5. (3.78ms; exec 3.65 + fetch 0.13; rows 21) SELECT individual.raw_club, individual.evidence_id, f.requested_url FROM sejm_individual_votes individual JOIN sejm_votes vote ON vote.object_id = individual.vote_id AND vote.current_revision_id = individual.vote_revision_id JOIN object_revisions revision ON revision.id = vote.current_revision_id JOIN evidence e ON e.id = individual.evidence_id JOIN fetches f ON f.id = e.fetch_id WHERE vote.term = 10 AND vote.sitting_number = 37 AND individual.mp_number = 287 AND LEFT(JSON_VALUE(revision.snapshot, '$.date'), 10) = '2025-06-25' AND individual.raw_club IS NOT NULL AND individual.raw_club <> '' ORDER BY vote.voting_number DESC