Brak głosu imiennego z tego dnia, który potwierdzałby klub mówcy.
Pełna wypowiedź
10. kadencja, 64. posiedzenie, 1. dzień (02-09-2026) 10. punkt porządku dziennego: Sprawozdanie Komisji Gospodarki i Rozwoju oraz Komisji Ochrony Środowiska, Zasobów Naturalnych i Leśnictwa o rządowym projekcie ustawy o zmianie ustawy o przeciwdziałaniu nieuczciwym praktykom rynkowym oraz ustawy o prawach konsumenta (druki nr 2799 i 3043). Poseł Paweł Sałek: Szanowna Pani Marszałek! Wysoka Izbo! Panie Ministrze! Panie Prezesie! W dokumentacji tej ustawy dotyczącej tzw. greenwashingu i dobrowolnego etykietowania - jak to wybrzmiało w komisjach, w których obradowaliśmy - państwo wskazują, że ta ustawa nie będzie wprowadzała obciążeń dla naszego sektora przedsiębiorstw. Tu pojawia się problem, dlatego że państwo twierdzą, że nie będzie tych opłat, że to będzie, można powiedzieć, bezkosztowe, a jednocześnie Komisja Europejska w swojej ocenie skutków regulacji zawarła informację, że te koszty będą znaczne. Problem polega na tym - jak to tradycyjnie bywa w przypadku legislacji unijnej - że w przypadku polityki unijnej i tego dokumentu koszty są policzone dla całej Unii Europejskiej. Chciałbym zapytać pana prezesa bardzo precyzyjnie, czy w Polsce są wyliczenia, ile wprowadzenie (Dzwonek) tej ustawy będzie kosztowało polskie przedsiębiorstwa. Bo nie chodzi o to, żebyśmy mieli koszty policzone dla całej Unii Europejskiej, bo nie można porównywać Malty i Polski czy Niemiec i Hiszpanii, tylko odnoszę się w tym przypadku do naszego kraju. Dziękuję uprzejmie. Przebieg posiedzenia
1. (2.79ms; exec 2.74 + fetch 0.04; rows 1) SELECT s.object_id AS statement_id, s.statement_number, s.speaker_name, s.source_member_id, mp.object_id AS member_id, day.object_id AS day_id, day.term, day.proceeding_number, day.source_date, day.current_revision_id AS day_revision_id, dayStatement.ordinal, dayEvidence.id AS list_evidence_id, dayEvidence.selector_type AS list_selector_type, dayEvidence.selector AS list_selector, dayFetch.id AS list_fetch_id, dayFetch.requested_url AS list_source_url, dayArtifact.sha256 AS list_sha256, binding.artifact_id, binding.evidence_id AS transcript_evidence_id, transcriptEvidence.selector_type AS transcript_selector_type, transcriptEvidence.selector AS transcript_selector, transcriptFetch.id AS transcript_fetch_id, transcriptFetch.requested_url AS transcript_source_url, artifact.sha256 AS transcript_sha256, artifact.detected_mime, artifact.byte_size FROM sejm_statements s JOIN sejm_transcript_days day ON day.object_id = s.transcript_day_id LEFT JOIN sejm_mp_identities mp ON mp.term = day.term AND mp.mp_number = s.source_member_id LEFT JOIN sejm_transcript_day_statements dayStatement ON dayStatement.day_id = day.object_id AND dayStatement.day_revision_id = day.current_revision_id AND dayStatement.statement_id = s.object_id LEFT JOIN evidence dayEvidence ON dayEvidence.id = dayStatement.evidence_id LEFT JOIN fetches dayFetch ON dayFetch.id = dayEvidence.fetch_id LEFT JOIN artifacts dayArtifact ON dayArtifact.id = dayEvidence.artifact_id LEFT JOIN documents document ON document.owner_object_id = day.object_id AND document.document_kind = 'statement_transcript' AND document.source_document_key = CONCAT('sejm:statement:', s.statement_number) LEFT JOIN document_versions version ON version.document_id = document.object_id AND version.sequence_no = (SELECT MAX(latest.sequence_no) FROM document_versions latest WHERE latest.document_id = document.object_id) LEFT JOIN document_version_artifacts binding ON binding.version_id = version.object_id AND binding.role = 'html' AND binding.current_selector_sha IS NOT NULL LEFT JOIN evidence transcriptEvidence ON transcriptEvidence.id = binding.evidence_id LEFT JOIN fetches transcriptFetch ON transcriptFetch.id = transcriptEvidence.fetch_id LEFT JOIN artifacts artifact ON artifact.id = binding.artifact_id WHERE s.object_id = 17343 LIMIT 1
2. (2.76ms; exec 2.7 + fetch 0.05; rows 1) WITH ranked AS ( SELECT extraction.id, extraction.source_artifact_id, extraction.quality_state, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY extraction.source_artifact_id ORDER BY CASE extraction.quality_state WHEN 'success' THEN 0 WHEN 'unreadable' THEN 1 ELSE 2 END, run.finished_at DESC, extraction.id DESC) AS preference FROM extractions extraction JOIN processing_runs run ON run.id = extraction.run_id WHERE extraction.source_artifact_id IN (18148) AND run.state = 'completed' ) SELECT ranked.source_artifact_id, ranked.id, ranked.quality_state, segment.source_text AS source_text FROM ranked LEFT JOIN text_segments segment ON segment.extraction_id = ranked.id WHERE ranked.preference = 1 ORDER BY ranked.source_artifact_id, segment.ordinal
3. (2.18ms; exec 2.15 + fetch 0.03; rows 4) SELECT statement.object_id, statement.statement_number, statement.speaker_name, dayStatement.ordinal, binding.artifact_id FROM sejm_transcript_day_statements dayStatement JOIN sejm_statements statement ON statement.object_id = dayStatement.statement_id LEFT JOIN documents document ON document.owner_object_id = dayStatement.day_id AND document.document_kind = 'statement_transcript' AND document.source_document_key = CONCAT('sejm:statement:', statement.statement_number) LEFT JOIN document_versions version ON version.document_id = document.object_id AND version.sequence_no = (SELECT MAX(latest.sequence_no) FROM document_versions latest WHERE latest.document_id = document.object_id) LEFT JOIN document_version_artifacts binding ON binding.version_id = version.object_id AND binding.role = 'html' AND binding.language = 'und' AND binding.current_selector_sha IS NOT NULL WHERE dayStatement.day_id = 17033 AND dayStatement.day_revision_id = 16659 AND dayStatement.ordinal BETWEEN 307 AND 311 AND statement.object_id <> 17343 ORDER BY dayStatement.ordinal
4. (1.83ms; exec 1.78 + fetch 0.05; rows 4) WITH ranked AS ( SELECT extraction.id, extraction.source_artifact_id, extraction.quality_state, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY extraction.source_artifact_id ORDER BY CASE extraction.quality_state WHEN 'success' THEN 0 WHEN 'unreadable' THEN 1 ELSE 2 END, run.finished_at DESC, extraction.id DESC) AS preference FROM extractions extraction JOIN processing_runs run ON run.id = extraction.run_id WHERE extraction.source_artifact_id IN (18133, 18134, 18149, 18150) AND run.state = 'completed' ) SELECT ranked.source_artifact_id, ranked.id, ranked.quality_state, LEFT(segment.source_text, 240) AS source_text FROM ranked LEFT JOIN text_segments segment ON segment.extraction_id = ranked.id WHERE ranked.preference = 1 ORDER BY ranked.source_artifact_id, segment.ordinal
5. (2.77ms; exec 2.74 + fetch 0.03; rows 0) SELECT individual.raw_club, individual.evidence_id, f.requested_url FROM sejm_individual_votes individual JOIN sejm_votes vote ON vote.object_id = individual.vote_id AND vote.current_revision_id = individual.vote_revision_id JOIN object_revisions revision ON revision.id = vote.current_revision_id JOIN evidence e ON e.id = individual.evidence_id JOIN fetches f ON f.id = e.fetch_id WHERE vote.term = 10 AND vote.sitting_number = 64 AND individual.mp_number = 322 AND LEFT(JSON_VALUE(revision.snapshot, '$.date'), 10) = '2026-09-02' AND individual.raw_club IS NOT NULL AND individual.raw_club <> '' ORDER BY vote.voting_number DESC