Brak głosu imiennego z tego dnia, który potwierdzałby klub mówcy.
Pełna wypowiedź
10. kadencja, 59. posiedzenie, 1. dzień (09-06-2026) 4. punkt porządku dziennego: Pierwsze czytanie rządowego projektu ustawy o osobistych kontach inwestycyjnych (druk nr 2580). Poseł Wioletta Maria Kulpa: Tak, oczywiście. Już po. Panie Marszałku! Wysoka Izbo! Wątpliwości budzi kwestia skutków fiskalnych. Rząd zakłada, że preferencje podatkowe zwiększą aktywność inwestycyjną Polaków, jednak brak jest tak naprawdę jednoznacznych danych potwierdzających, czy nie dojdzie jedynie do przesunięcia środków z istniejących produktów oszczędnościowych do nowego instrumentu. Zatem, czy Ministerstwo Finansów przeprowadziło analizę, jaki odsetek środków zgromadzonych na osobistych kontach inwestycyjnych będzie stanowił rzeczywiście nowe oszczędności gospodarstw domowych, a jaka część będzie jedynie transferem aktywów z istniejących produktów, takich jak IKE, IKZE czy lokaty bankowe? Jeśli tak, to proszę o przedstawienie takich danych. W jaki sposób również oszacowano skutki fiskalne projektu dla budżetu państwa, biorąc pod uwagę zwolnienia podatkowe do 100 tys. zł dla aktywów inwestycyjnych i 25 tys. zł dla aktywów oszczędnościowych? Czy OSR zawiera analizę ryzyka, że z preferencji podatkowej będą korzystały głównie osoby o najwyższych dochodach (Dzwonek), wówczas bez istotnego wzrostu poziomu oszczędności wśród przeciętnych Polaków? Dziękuję bardzo. (Oklaski) Przebieg posiedzenia
1. (1.94ms; exec 1.91 + fetch 0.03; rows 1) SELECT s.object_id AS statement_id, s.statement_number, s.speaker_name, s.source_member_id, mp.object_id AS member_id, day.object_id AS day_id, day.term, day.proceeding_number, day.source_date, day.current_revision_id AS day_revision_id, dayStatement.ordinal, dayEvidence.id AS list_evidence_id, dayEvidence.selector_type AS list_selector_type, dayEvidence.selector AS list_selector, dayFetch.id AS list_fetch_id, dayFetch.requested_url AS list_source_url, dayArtifact.sha256 AS list_sha256, binding.artifact_id, binding.evidence_id AS transcript_evidence_id, transcriptEvidence.selector_type AS transcript_selector_type, transcriptEvidence.selector AS transcript_selector, transcriptFetch.id AS transcript_fetch_id, transcriptFetch.requested_url AS transcript_source_url, artifact.sha256 AS transcript_sha256, artifact.detected_mime, artifact.byte_size FROM sejm_statements s JOIN sejm_transcript_days day ON day.object_id = s.transcript_day_id LEFT JOIN sejm_mp_identities mp ON mp.term = day.term AND mp.mp_number = s.source_member_id LEFT JOIN sejm_transcript_day_statements dayStatement ON dayStatement.day_id = day.object_id AND dayStatement.day_revision_id = day.current_revision_id AND dayStatement.statement_id = s.object_id LEFT JOIN evidence dayEvidence ON dayEvidence.id = dayStatement.evidence_id LEFT JOIN fetches dayFetch ON dayFetch.id = dayEvidence.fetch_id LEFT JOIN artifacts dayArtifact ON dayArtifact.id = dayEvidence.artifact_id LEFT JOIN documents document ON document.owner_object_id = day.object_id AND document.document_kind = 'statement_transcript' AND document.source_document_key = CONCAT('sejm:statement:', s.statement_number) LEFT JOIN document_versions version ON version.document_id = document.object_id AND version.sequence_no = (SELECT MAX(latest.sequence_no) FROM document_versions latest WHERE latest.document_id = document.object_id) LEFT JOIN document_version_artifacts binding ON binding.version_id = version.object_id AND binding.role = 'html' AND binding.current_selector_sha IS NOT NULL LEFT JOIN evidence transcriptEvidence ON transcriptEvidence.id = binding.evidence_id LEFT JOIN fetches transcriptFetch ON transcriptFetch.id = transcriptEvidence.fetch_id LEFT JOIN artifacts artifact ON artifact.id = binding.artifact_id WHERE s.object_id = 27020 LIMIT 1
2. (1.82ms; exec 1.8 + fetch 0.02; rows 1) WITH ranked AS ( SELECT extraction.id, extraction.source_artifact_id, extraction.quality_state, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY extraction.source_artifact_id ORDER BY CASE extraction.quality_state WHEN 'success' THEN 0 WHEN 'unreadable' THEN 1 ELSE 2 END, run.finished_at DESC, extraction.id DESC) AS preference FROM extractions extraction JOIN processing_runs run ON run.id = extraction.run_id WHERE extraction.source_artifact_id IN (29349) AND run.state = 'completed' ) SELECT ranked.source_artifact_id, ranked.id, ranked.quality_state, segment.source_text AS source_text FROM ranked LEFT JOIN text_segments segment ON segment.extraction_id = ranked.id WHERE ranked.preference = 1 ORDER BY ranked.source_artifact_id, segment.ordinal
3. (1.52ms; exec 1.51 + fetch 0.02; rows 4) SELECT statement.object_id, statement.statement_number, statement.speaker_name, dayStatement.ordinal, binding.artifact_id FROM sejm_transcript_day_statements dayStatement JOIN sejm_statements statement ON statement.object_id = dayStatement.statement_id LEFT JOIN documents document ON document.owner_object_id = dayStatement.day_id AND document.document_kind = 'statement_transcript' AND document.source_document_key = CONCAT('sejm:statement:', statement.statement_number) LEFT JOIN document_versions version ON version.document_id = document.object_id AND version.sequence_no = (SELECT MAX(latest.sequence_no) FROM document_versions latest WHERE latest.document_id = document.object_id) LEFT JOIN document_version_artifacts binding ON binding.version_id = version.object_id AND binding.role = 'html' AND binding.language = 'und' AND binding.current_selector_sha IS NOT NULL WHERE dayStatement.day_id = 26887 AND dayStatement.day_revision_id = 26586 AND dayStatement.ordinal BETWEEN 130 AND 134 AND statement.object_id <> 27020 ORDER BY dayStatement.ordinal
4. (0.98ms; exec 0.96 + fetch 0.02; rows 4) WITH ranked AS ( SELECT extraction.id, extraction.source_artifact_id, extraction.quality_state, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY extraction.source_artifact_id ORDER BY CASE extraction.quality_state WHEN 'success' THEN 0 WHEN 'unreadable' THEN 1 ELSE 2 END, run.finished_at DESC, extraction.id DESC) AS preference FROM extractions extraction JOIN processing_runs run ON run.id = extraction.run_id WHERE extraction.source_artifact_id IN (29347, 29348, 29350, 29358) AND run.state = 'completed' ) SELECT ranked.source_artifact_id, ranked.id, ranked.quality_state, LEFT(segment.source_text, 240) AS source_text FROM ranked LEFT JOIN text_segments segment ON segment.extraction_id = ranked.id WHERE ranked.preference = 1 ORDER BY ranked.source_artifact_id, segment.ordinal
5. (1.17ms; exec 1.16 + fetch 0.01; rows 0) SELECT individual.raw_club, individual.evidence_id, f.requested_url FROM sejm_individual_votes individual JOIN sejm_votes vote ON vote.object_id = individual.vote_id AND vote.current_revision_id = individual.vote_revision_id JOIN object_revisions revision ON revision.id = vote.current_revision_id JOIN evidence e ON e.id = individual.evidence_id JOIN fetches f ON f.id = e.fetch_id WHERE vote.term = 10 AND vote.sitting_number = 59 AND individual.mp_number = 476 AND LEFT(JSON_VALUE(revision.snapshot, '$.date'), 10) = '2026-06-09' AND individual.raw_club IS NOT NULL AND individual.raw_club <> '' ORDER BY vote.voting_number DESC