Brak głosu imiennego z tego dnia, który potwierdzałby klub mówcy.
Pełna wypowiedź
10. kadencja, 62. posiedzenie, 1. dzień (15-07-2026) 3. punkt porządku dziennego: Sprawozdanie Komisji Sprawiedliwości i Praw Człowieka o komisyjnym projekcie ustawy o zmianie ustawy - Prawo o adwokaturze (druki nr 1962 i 2689). Poseł Mariusz Krystian (tekst niewygłoszony): Pytania 1. Art. 4ca, art. 68a i art. 95ła wprowadzają przetwarzanie danych wrażliwych o adwokatach, w tym danych o zdrowiu i wyrokach skazujących. Czy okręgowe rady adwokackie, które nie są organami władzy publicznej, mają realne środki i wyszkolony personel do zabezpieczenia takich danych zgodnie z RODO? 2. Art. 1a dopuszcza finansowanie samorządu adwokackiego z dotacji, subwencji i darowizn z ˝innych źródeł˝ bez bliższego doprecyzowania. Czy przepis nie powinien wprost wykluczać finansowania z zagranicznych źródeł, by nie narazić niezależności samorządu prawniczego na wpływy zewnętrzne? 3. Nowy art. 7 ust. 3 zastępuje dotychczasowe niejasne odesłanie do ochrony ˝podobnie jak sędzia i prokurator˝ wyraźnym odesłaniem do Kodeksu karnego. Dlaczego jednocześnie z tą zmianą nie zaproponowano analogicznego doprecyzowania dla radców prawnych? Czy nie prowadzi to do fragmentaryzacji ochrony zawodów prawniczych? 4. Art. 95o wprowadza karę za bezprawne posługiwanie się tytułem ˝adwokat˝, ale przestępstwo to jest ścigane dopiero po jego ujawnieniu. Czy przewidziano konkretny mechanizm wykrywania takich przypadków, zwłaszcza w Internecie, gdzie oszuści podszywający się pod prawników coraz częściej okradają starsze samotne osoby? Przebieg posiedzenia
1. (3.42ms; exec 3.37 + fetch 0.06; rows 1) SELECT s.object_id AS statement_id, s.statement_number, s.speaker_name, s.source_member_id, mp.object_id AS member_id, day.object_id AS day_id, day.term, day.proceeding_number, day.source_date, day.current_revision_id AS day_revision_id, dayStatement.ordinal, dayEvidence.id AS list_evidence_id, dayEvidence.selector_type AS list_selector_type, dayEvidence.selector AS list_selector, dayFetch.id AS list_fetch_id, dayFetch.requested_url AS list_source_url, dayArtifact.sha256 AS list_sha256, binding.artifact_id, binding.evidence_id AS transcript_evidence_id, transcriptEvidence.selector_type AS transcript_selector_type, transcriptEvidence.selector AS transcript_selector, transcriptFetch.id AS transcript_fetch_id, transcriptFetch.requested_url AS transcript_source_url, artifact.sha256 AS transcript_sha256, artifact.detected_mime, artifact.byte_size FROM sejm_statements s JOIN sejm_transcript_days day ON day.object_id = s.transcript_day_id LEFT JOIN sejm_mp_identities mp ON mp.term = day.term AND mp.mp_number = s.source_member_id LEFT JOIN sejm_transcript_day_statements dayStatement ON dayStatement.day_id = day.object_id AND dayStatement.day_revision_id = day.current_revision_id AND dayStatement.statement_id = s.object_id LEFT JOIN evidence dayEvidence ON dayEvidence.id = dayStatement.evidence_id LEFT JOIN fetches dayFetch ON dayFetch.id = dayEvidence.fetch_id LEFT JOIN artifacts dayArtifact ON dayArtifact.id = dayEvidence.artifact_id LEFT JOIN documents document ON document.owner_object_id = day.object_id AND document.document_kind = 'statement_transcript' AND document.source_document_key = CONCAT('sejm:statement:', s.statement_number) LEFT JOIN document_versions version ON version.document_id = document.object_id AND version.sequence_no = (SELECT MAX(latest.sequence_no) FROM document_versions latest WHERE latest.document_id = document.object_id) LEFT JOIN document_version_artifacts binding ON binding.version_id = version.object_id AND binding.role = 'html' AND binding.current_selector_sha IS NOT NULL LEFT JOIN evidence transcriptEvidence ON transcriptEvidence.id = binding.evidence_id LEFT JOIN fetches transcriptFetch ON transcriptFetch.id = transcriptEvidence.fetch_id LEFT JOIN artifacts artifact ON artifact.id = binding.artifact_id WHERE s.object_id = 18489 LIMIT 1
2. (4.15ms; exec 4.1 + fetch 0.04; rows 1) WITH ranked AS ( SELECT extraction.id, extraction.source_artifact_id, extraction.quality_state, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY extraction.source_artifact_id ORDER BY CASE extraction.quality_state WHEN 'success' THEN 0 WHEN 'unreadable' THEN 1 ELSE 2 END, run.finished_at DESC, extraction.id DESC) AS preference FROM extractions extraction JOIN processing_runs run ON run.id = extraction.run_id WHERE extraction.source_artifact_id IN (19084) AND run.state = 'completed' ) SELECT ranked.source_artifact_id, ranked.id, ranked.quality_state, segment.source_text AS source_text FROM ranked LEFT JOIN text_segments segment ON segment.extraction_id = ranked.id WHERE ranked.preference = 1 ORDER BY ranked.source_artifact_id, segment.ordinal
3. (3.08ms; exec 3.04 + fetch 0.04; rows 4) SELECT statement.object_id, statement.statement_number, statement.speaker_name, dayStatement.ordinal, binding.artifact_id FROM sejm_transcript_day_statements dayStatement JOIN sejm_statements statement ON statement.object_id = dayStatement.statement_id LEFT JOIN documents document ON document.owner_object_id = dayStatement.day_id AND document.document_kind = 'statement_transcript' AND document.source_document_key = CONCAT('sejm:statement:', statement.statement_number) LEFT JOIN document_versions version ON version.document_id = document.object_id AND version.sequence_no = (SELECT MAX(latest.sequence_no) FROM document_versions latest WHERE latest.document_id = document.object_id) LEFT JOIN document_version_artifacts binding ON binding.version_id = version.object_id AND binding.role = 'html' AND binding.language = 'und' AND binding.current_selector_sha IS NOT NULL WHERE dayStatement.day_id = 18416 AND dayStatement.day_revision_id = 18064 AND dayStatement.ordinal BETWEEN 70 AND 74 AND statement.object_id <> 18489 ORDER BY dayStatement.ordinal
4. (2.51ms; exec 2.46 + fetch 0.04; rows 4) WITH ranked AS ( SELECT extraction.id, extraction.source_artifact_id, extraction.quality_state, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY extraction.source_artifact_id ORDER BY CASE extraction.quality_state WHEN 'success' THEN 0 WHEN 'unreadable' THEN 1 ELSE 2 END, run.finished_at DESC, extraction.id DESC) AS preference FROM extractions extraction JOIN processing_runs run ON run.id = extraction.run_id WHERE extraction.source_artifact_id IN (19082, 19083, 19085, 19093) AND run.state = 'completed' ) SELECT ranked.source_artifact_id, ranked.id, ranked.quality_state, LEFT(segment.source_text, 240) AS source_text FROM ranked LEFT JOIN text_segments segment ON segment.extraction_id = ranked.id WHERE ranked.preference = 1 ORDER BY ranked.source_artifact_id, segment.ordinal
5. (9.57ms; exec 9.53 + fetch 0.04; rows 0) SELECT individual.raw_club, individual.evidence_id, f.requested_url FROM sejm_individual_votes individual JOIN sejm_votes vote ON vote.object_id = individual.vote_id AND vote.current_revision_id = individual.vote_revision_id JOIN object_revisions revision ON revision.id = vote.current_revision_id JOIN evidence e ON e.id = individual.evidence_id JOIN fetches f ON f.id = e.fetch_id WHERE vote.term = 10 AND vote.sitting_number = 62 AND individual.mp_number = 193 AND LEFT(JSON_VALUE(revision.snapshot, '$.date'), 10) = '2026-07-15' AND individual.raw_club IS NOT NULL AND individual.raw_club <> '' ORDER BY vote.voting_number DESC